[Xenopus] Give the NIH feedback about Xenbase and other resources/tools you use! Take the RFI survey! (NOT-OD-21-182)
alfandar at vasci.umass.edu
Tue Sep 21 09:30:38 EDT 2021
Thank you very useful.
Please also mention the antibody work if you are so inclined (R24OD021485)
Dominique Alfandari PhD
Preferred Pronouns: He/Him/His
Professor, UMass Amherst
ISB 427B, 661 North Pleasant street
Amherst, MA 01003.
From: xenopus-bounces at lists.mbl.edu <xenopus-bounces at lists.mbl.edu> on behalf of James-Zorn, Christina <Christina.James_Zorn at cchmc.org>
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2021 2:49 PM
To: Xine email list <Xenopus at lists.mbl.edu>
Subject: [Xenopus] Give the NIH feedback about Xenbase and other resources/tools you use! Take the RFI survey! (NOT-OD-21-182)
Greeting Xenopus researchers
The NIH (Office of Portfolio Analysis) is seeking input from the biomedical community around the world as to how people use NIH funded resources, like PubMed, the model organism databases (like Xenbase, Flybase MGI AGR etc), various tools and "the way you access information about Biomedical topics".
This is important! Please respond to this RFI, and emphasize the utility and high value of our MOD, that is tailored for and responsive to the specific needs to the Xenopus research community.
A lack of response from the Xenopus research community may be used to justify consolidations or elimination of investigator-run MODs like Xenbase.
Read the full Request for Information below, and respond via the survey by October 15th, 2021
So go on – go all out and sing Xenbase's praises. If you have suggestions of how to make Xenbase better-tell them, and let us know too, email us at xenbase at uclagary.ca<mailto:xenbase at uclagary.ca>
Click this link to respond: <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5NGLNNJ> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5NGLNNJ.
Here is the full URL for the NIH's RFI: https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-21-182.html
Aaron Zorn and Peter Vize,
PIs @ Xenbase
Request for Information (RFI) on User Experience with Scientific Data Sources and Tools
September 1, 2021
October 15, 2021
Office of Portfolio Analysis (OPA<https://dpcpsi.nih.gov/opa>)
The purpose of this Request for Information (RFI) is to seek input from the scientific community to advance the fundamental understanding of experiences in using scientific data sources and tools.
The Office of Portfolio Analysis (OPA) was established in 2011 and is part of the Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives (DPCPSI) within the Office of the NIH Director (OD). OPA supports the NIH mission by expanding its analytic capabilities through development and dissemination of new methods, data sources, computational tools, and best practices for data-driven decision making. The following website provides an overview of previous and current OPA activities: https://dpcpsi.nih.gov/opa.
Information is being sought on the experience using scientific data sources and tools that may include, but are not limited to the following:
* NIH RePORTER
* Google Scholar
* FDA Orange Book
* Web of Science
OPA seeks the following information:
* Tell us about your experience with the way you access information about Biomedical topics. This could include reading articles, attending lectures, or watching related videos.
* Tell us about your experience and frequency of use of existing web tools or research databases (e.g., PubMed - every day, Google Scholar - every week, USAspending.gov - once a month, etc.).
* Please provide input on your intended purpose in using these tools (focused searches on a particular topic, explore content more broadly, or both?)
* Tell us about your experience with the functionalities, including unique functionalities, that you find to be most effective or useful, as well as functionalities that would improve one or more of the tools you use.
* Tell us about your experience with the tools you use to access productivity metrics (e.g., those used to measure productivity of individuals and/or groups), including ways these assessments and tools are limited, as well as potential opportunities or enhancements for these tools to facilitate measurement of productivity.
How to Submit a Response
To respond to this RFI, please go to the submission website: <https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5NGLNNJ> https://www.surveymonkey.com/r/5NGLNNJ.
Respondents are not required to provide their name with the response.
Responses to this RFI are voluntary. This RFI is for planning purposes only and should not be construed as a solicitation or an obligation on the part of the Federal Government, the National Institutes of Health, or individual NIH Institutes or Centers. The NIH does not intend to make any type of award based on responses to this RFI or to pay for either the preparation of information submitted or the Government’s use of such information.
The NIH will use the information submitted in response to this RFI at its discretion and will not provide comments to any responder's submission. However, responses to the RFI may be reflected in future funding opportunity announcements. The information provided will be analyzed and may be shared publicly or appear in reports. Respondents are advised that the Government is under no obligation to acknowledge receipt of the information received or provide feedback to respondents with respect to any information submitted. No proprietary, classified, confidential, or sensitive information should be included in your response. The Government reserves the right to use any non-proprietary technical information in any resultant solicitation(s).
Please direct all inquiries to:
George Santangelo, Ph.D.
Office of Portfolio Analysis
Division of Program Coordination, Planning, and Strategic Initiatives
Office of the Director
Email: opainformation at nih.gov<mailto:opainformation at nih.gov>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Xenopus